The Simulated Historical Crisis Committee is a type of committee relatively new to HSMUN. While this committee has no direct 1:1 correlation to any committee in the real United Nations, it can be thought of as an offshoot of the United Nations Security Council, in that it seeks to identify and resolve threats to peace and security through binding decisions and the potential use of military intervention. However, this committee is also very unique - the countries or states involved in the committee will be the relevant countries that existed at the time of the crisis. Moreover, the Simulated Historical Crisis Committee functions as a “live” committee, as directives can constantly be proposed by certain countries or blocs of countries, and the dais will respond to these directives and update the current situation accordingly. That is to say that there is no “ending resolution”; the crisis will be perpetually unfolding.

In the aftermath of World War II, the world stands at a crossroads. The devastation caused by the war has necessitated a comprehensive re-evaluation of international relations, territorial boundaries, and political ideologies. The founding members of the United Nations have gathered to draft a new world order, addressing the urgent need for peace, stability, and cooperation.

One of the foremost issues is the division of territories, particularly in Europe and Asia, where the war has left a complex legacy of occupation, displacement, and destruction. Delegates must negotiate the future of Germany and Japan, determining the extent of their territories and the conditions of their political and economic reconstruction. The issue of territorial divisions also extends to the broader geopolitical landscape, including the Middle East and Africa, where colonial powers face growing pressure to decolonize.

Decolonization is another critical topic, as many colonies seek independence and self-determination. Delegates must balance the aspirations of these colonies with the interests of colonial powers, ensuring a fair and orderly transition to sovereignty. This process will involve establishing new political structures, economic systems, and international support mechanisms to facilitate sustainable development.

The beginnings of Cold War politics are already evident, with ideological tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union influencing global affairs. Delegates must navigate this emerging rivalry, striving to prevent further conflict and promote cooperation. The Security Council will play a crucial role in establishing mechanisms for conflict resolution, arms control, and the promotion of human rights.

This historic session will set the tone for international relations in the post-war era, shaping the principles and structures that will guide the United Nations and the global community for decades to come.

1. How should the territories of defeated Axis powers, particularly Germany and Japan, be divided and governed?

2. What principles should guide the process of decolonization, and how can the transition to independence be managed fairly and effectively?

3. How can the Security Council address the ideological tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union to prevent the escalation of Cold War conflicts?

4. What mechanisms should be established to promote and protect human rights in the new world order?

5. How can international cooperation be fostered to ensure economic recovery and stability in war-torn regions?

6. What role should the United Nations play in the reconstruction of Europe and Asia, and how can it support sustainable development in newly independent states?

World War II: Background Info

Initial Attempt at Uniting the Globe

World War II: Politics